January 22, 2010

C-Section or Giving Birth Like A Pioneer Woman?

By Elizabeth

 

pioneerwoman

Throughout my pregnancy I have planned to give birth to my twins vaginally. Assuming there are no other complications, I believe, as do many experts, that it’s the healthiest way to have a baby. But, I’ve discovered that many women and men view vaginal birth as archaic and unnecessary. So am I one of the last pioneers?


A friend recently asked me if my doctor was “seriously considering a vaginal birth?” He thought all women having twins automatically have c-sections. Not true. Vaginal birth with twins depends on the position of the babies, your health and the health of the babies.

 

Some women choose a c-section simply for convenience or the desire to avoid the after effects of vaginal birth. According to the American College of Obstetricians, the rate of c-sections has gone from 5.5% in 1970 to almost 32% in 2007. But if the rate of surgical births continues to rise, will evolution take over and ultimately change the way women are able to give birth? Sounds far-fetched, but the thought has crossed my mind.

 

There are plenty of reasons for the increase in c-sections, but more interesting are some of the not so talked about reasons. Consider this-- some doctors prefer to do c-sections not because they think it’s better for you, but it’s better for them. Some doctors get paid more to perform c-sections and it’s certainly easier on their hectic schedules. I believe these doctors are certainly in the minority. But there is also a legitimate concern of litigation. If something goes wrong during a vaginal birth, some doctors fear possible lawsuits. As for the patient’s role, more women are now demanding c-sections. So what was once considered to be an emergency procedure seems to be the norm.

 

There are plenty of women who think recovery from a c-section is no big deal while others find the long recovery period and pain to be unnecessary.  I say do what’s best for you and your baby—just know the benefits and risks of both methods.


Risks Associated with C-Section:

* Higher risk of infection

* Adhesions (painful scar tissue under the skin)

* Pulmonary embolisms (blood clots)

* Complications from the use of anesthesia

* The potential need for future cesareans, which entail additional risk

Source: ACOG


Risks Associated with Vaginal Birth:

* An increased risk for pelvic floor dysfunction

* Increased occurance of incontinence

* An increased risk of vaginal tearing

* Increased complications if baby is not in a head down position



Comments (1)Add Comment
written by Rhonda Goddard Hamby, February 04, 2010
You are not alone
Be a pioneer woman. I did it twice with no drugs. Women have been doing it that way for thousands of years. I provide over population as proof that it works.

Next question: ant eater or helmet head? Circumcision is not just for Jews anymore. We went natural there too. It's his body. It should be his choice.

Write comment

busy